Gaza Ceasefire: Joe Biden or Donald Trump – Who Should Be Given Credits

Gaza Ceasefire: A Turning Point Amidst Political Rivalry
The recent ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas marks a significant milestone in Middle Eastern politics. However, the accord’s timing—coinciding with the U.S. presidential transition—has sparked a debate over who deserves credit: outgoing President Joe Biden or incoming President Donald Trump. This article examines the implications of the ceasefire, the political maneuvering behind it, and the lessons it holds for countries like Nigeria.
The Ceasefire Agreement
After 15 months of intense conflict, Israel and Hamas have agreed to a ceasefire that includes the release of hostages and a phased military withdrawal from Gaza. The deal, brokered with the assistance of U.S. diplomats, is set to commence on January 19 and will unfold over several phases:
- Initial Ceasefire: A six-week truce during which both parties will halt military operations.
- Hostage and Prisoner Exchange: Hamas will release 33 Israeli hostages in exchange for several hundred Palestinian women and children detained by Israel. (Vox)
- Israeli Military Withdrawal: A phased pullout of Israeli troops from key areas in Gaza, contingent upon the successful implementation of the initial stages. (NY Post)
Biden’s Role
President Joe Biden asserts that his administration laid the groundwork for this agreement. In a recent press conference, he stated that the ceasefire was “developed and negotiated by my team and will be largely implemented by the incoming administration.” Biden’s diplomatic efforts, particularly through Secretary of State Antony Blinken, have been ongoing since May, aiming to bring both parties to the negotiating table, as reported by The Guardian.
Trump’s Involvement
President-elect Donald Trump, however, claims that the deal’s fruition is a direct result of his election victory. He argues that the prospect of his administration’s approach to Middle Eastern policy compelled both Israel and Hamas to agree to the ceasefire. Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, played a notable role in the negotiations, even meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to advocate for the agreement.
The Nigerian Perspective
From a Nigerian standpoint, this development holds particular significance. Nigeria has long been involved in peacekeeping missions and diplomatic efforts across Africa and the Middle East. The successful negotiation of a ceasefire in Gaza serves as a case study in conflict resolution, offering valuable lessons for addressing regional conflicts such as those in the Lake Chad Basin and the Niger Delta.
Key Lessons for Nigeria:
- Sustained Engagement: The U.S. persisted in its diplomatic efforts despite numerous setbacks. Nigeria’s conflict resolution strategies can benefit from a similar commitment.
- Inclusivity: The Gaza ceasefire involved multiple stakeholders, from governments to non-state actors. Nigerian mediators should adopt a more inclusive approach when addressing conflicts.
- Economic Leverage: By using economic incentives and sanctions, the U.S. added weight to its negotiations. Nigeria could employ economic tools to influence peace outcomes in its regions.
Lessons in Diplomacy
The Gaza ceasefire underscores the importance of sustained diplomatic engagement and the willingness to involve multiple stakeholders in peace negotiations. It also highlights the impact of political transitions on international relations. For Nigerian diplomats and policymakers, the key takeaway is the necessity of a cohesive strategy that transcends individual administrations, ensuring continuity and effectiveness in foreign policy.
Engage Multiple Parties
Successful negotiations often require the involvement of various stakeholders, including rival political factions. Nigeria can apply this approach in mediating regional conflicts by involving local leaders, neighbouring countries, and international organisations.
Ensure Policy Continuity
Political transitions should not disrupt diplomatic efforts. Establishing bipartisan support for foreign policy initiatives can help maintain momentum in peace negotiations.
Leverage International Support
Collaborating with global powers can provide the necessary leverage to bring conflicting parties to the table. Nigeria’s active participation in international forums can enhance its diplomatic influence.
Broader Implications
The ceasefire’s impact extends beyond the immediate region. It highlights the interplay between local conflicts and global geopolitics, the importance of humanitarian considerations, and the role of media in shaping narratives.
Humanitarian Aspect:
The conflict has displaced hundreds of thousands of people and caused a humanitarian crisis in Gaza. The ceasefire opens a window for humanitarian aid to flow into the region. Organisations like the Red Cross and UNHCR have already mobilised resources to address urgent needs. Nigeria, which has faced its share of humanitarian crises, can collaborate with international agencies to enhance its disaster response mechanisms.
Geopolitical Dynamics:
The U.S. role in brokering the ceasefire underscores its influence in global politics. For Nigeria, this is a reminder of the importance of strategic alliances. Strengthening ties with key players such as the African Union, the European Union, and the United Nations can bolster Nigeria’s position on the world stage.
The Role of Media
Media coverage of the Gaza conflict has been extensive, shaping public opinion and influencing diplomatic efforts. Nigerian media can draw lessons from this by:
- Providing Balanced Reporting: Ensuring that both sides of a conflict are represented fairly.
- Highlighting Human Stories: Personal narratives often resonate more than statistics, fostering empathy and understanding.
- Amplifying Diplomatic Efforts: Media can play a critical role in promoting peace initiatives by giving them visibility.
Looking Ahead
While the ceasefire is a step in the right direction, lasting peace requires addressing underlying issues. For Gaza, this includes:
- Economic Rehabilitation: Reviving Gaza’s economy to provide livelihoods and reduce dependence on external aid.
- Infrastructure Development: Rebuilding schools, hospitals, and homes destroyed during the conflict.
- Political Stability: Promoting governance reforms to address grievances and foster reconciliation.
Conclusion
The Gaza ceasefire agreement is a testament to the power of diplomacy and the potential for peaceful resolution even in protracted conflicts. For Nigeria, it offers a blueprint for engaging in effective conflict resolution and underscores the importance of strategic, sustained, and inclusive diplomatic efforts. By learning from global examples like this, Nigeria can enhance its role as a mediator in regional and international conflicts, foster a more peaceful and prosperous future.
0 comment